I used to pride myself in being a bare bones, most basic, purist when it came to training. I thought that using anything other than a snaffle meant that you hadn't put in enough time training or that there was a hole in your training foundation. I used to think that if you couldn't get it done without any gadgets that you should just keep grinding the gears until you could figure it out. Well, I was wrong.
The talk that I have with all of my students when they are learning about contact and a horse being "round", or "through", or "on the bit" or whatever you want to call it goes something like this:
Me- "What do we sit on?"
Rider- "Their back"
Me- "Is that a strong place or a weak place on the horse?"
Rider- thinks, looks around at the horse then with some slight sound of dread... "weak"
Me- "yes, we sit on the weakest part of their body. When they don't have a rider on them, they are perfectly safe to move however they want, but when we get on it's our job to get them to use their other muscles and body parts to turn their back into a strong place so that they don't get injured from carrying our weight."
The talk that I have with all of my students when they are learning about contact and a horse being "round", or "through", or "on the bit" or whatever you want to call it goes something like this:
Me- "What do we sit on?"
Rider- "Their back"
Me- "Is that a strong place or a weak place on the horse?"
Rider- thinks, looks around at the horse then with some slight sound of dread... "weak"
Me- "yes, we sit on the weakest part of their body. When they don't have a rider on them, they are perfectly safe to move however they want, but when we get on it's our job to get them to use their other muscles and body parts to turn their back into a strong place so that they don't get injured from carrying our weight."
So, if it's our job to keep them sound... because we all know they weren't the ones with the bright idea of putting 150lb on their back... isn't it also our job to fill our tool box full of tools to help them? Isn't it our job to fill our tool box with tools that support our horses while our students learn to do it all on their own?
Now I'm not talking about cutting corners or forcing false frames, but I am talking about being well educated about equine anatomy, physiology and bio mechanics and using appropriate tools to encourage or support a horse to use their body properly. If we all know that a horse needs steady contact to push their forward energy into, but we have a rider who is still only able to focus on the "forward energy" part why not offer the horse (and rider) a steady contact via neck stretcher? That way, the horse has a contact that won't drop away a million times and the rider can feel what it's like to send the horse toward a steady contact and what happens to their frame and gaits when they have a steady contact on the other end of the forward energy. Wouldn't that help connect the dots for what our riders are looking to feel better than trying to explain it to death? Teaching someone to FEEL something is HARD... why not find ways for them to learn the feel by feeling it? And in the mean time, let's not allow our horses to go around inverted and risk injury. The Spanish Riding School doesn't allow their horses to go around like giraffes while their students spend what I'm sure seems like a century on the line with no reins... so why should we?
Now I'm not talking about cutting corners or forcing false frames, but I am talking about being well educated about equine anatomy, physiology and bio mechanics and using appropriate tools to encourage or support a horse to use their body properly. If we all know that a horse needs steady contact to push their forward energy into, but we have a rider who is still only able to focus on the "forward energy" part why not offer the horse (and rider) a steady contact via neck stretcher? That way, the horse has a contact that won't drop away a million times and the rider can feel what it's like to send the horse toward a steady contact and what happens to their frame and gaits when they have a steady contact on the other end of the forward energy. Wouldn't that help connect the dots for what our riders are looking to feel better than trying to explain it to death? Teaching someone to FEEL something is HARD... why not find ways for them to learn the feel by feeling it? And in the mean time, let's not allow our horses to go around inverted and risk injury. The Spanish Riding School doesn't allow their horses to go around like giraffes while their students spend what I'm sure seems like a century on the line with no reins... so why should we?
When I have a rider who is jumping a horse who gets strong to the fences, should I let her flounder in a snaffle... teaching her to start riding backwards toward the jump and increasingly killing the nerves in the horse's mouth, or should I give her some tools to help her ride softly and help her horse learn to follow the leader? The right bit for the job can make a world of difference. Does this mean that we skip the basics and ignore whatever the root of the "strong to fences" issue is? No. But it does mean that I'd rather keep my rider having good habits, a horse who can be ridden softer, and a team that approaches jumps safely.
I have seen so many of my riders put on a well adjusted neck stretcher for the first 10 minutes of their ride, get their horses forward and get the feel of the steady connection and then take it off to then be able to seamlessly go replicate the feeling.... that right there is magical. Why would we deny our riders such a wonderful way to discover connection with their horse?
So, this post may not be about my red mare... but if my red mare has taught me one thing it is to work smarter not harder and find the best tools for the job.
So, this post may not be about my red mare... but if my red mare has taught me one thing it is to work smarter not harder and find the best tools for the job.